Monday, April 11, 2011

Vegan Pie Crust

  • 3 Cups Pastry Flour
  • 1 teaspoon salt
  • 3/4 cup margarine
  • 6 tablespoons cold water - give or take

In Bowl - combine Flour and Salt
Slowly add margarine as you mix
Add cold water gradually (spoon in water, then mix)
Shape dough into ball and toss in fridge for a bit until it gets cold (should be about 10-15 minutes, or as long as it takes to prepare your pie mix)

Once cold, place on floured surface and with rolling pin, spread enough.
Place on pie sheet, cut excess.

Note: This makes more than enough for two pie crusts worth of dough...save other piece for later use.

This dough can be used for any pie...the excess dough could be used for pie shell (if baking that kind of pie)

Monday, January 31, 2011

What am I doing wrong?

For about the last four to six months I have been passively looking for a better job and have yet to find any success. My career aspiration is fairly broad with me trying to find anything that I am remotely qualified (4 year Customer Service, 4 years Event Volunteering, 3 years Video Games writing/cover) but I have not only not had any success finding a better or more interesting job, I haven't even been contact for an interview or even a talk over the phone.

I am constantly wondering what am I doing wrong. Is my resume format incorrect? Am I not vocal enough with my hunting? Are companies really that bias when hiring that they only look for one specific word and I'm missing that? There are so many questions I have and it's really getting frustrating.

I currently work, but I can't see myself working at the same place for very much longer. I have given them the last four years of my life and the return on that investment hasn't amounted to much. I get passed on every promotion even though I have a great work ethic: always looked upon to help others.

Since I have such a great work ethic, able to finish tasks quickly and efficiently, has that actually put in a disadvantage. Since I can handle a greater workload that others, it just means that they can keep me in the same role and not worry about others because I'll cover for them. But it's frustrating and I hate it.

I was always told, if you don't like what you're doing, then don't do it. That might work in certain facets of life, but not work. You can't just quit a job if you're not in a position where you can say 'fuck it' and take some time off. I live alone and in an expensive city; if I quit, I might as well just move back to Ottawa and my mother's basement, which I honestly do not want.

If only I knew what people were looking for, then I would do just that. I am so qualified, but there is just something about me that is not appealing enough when they skim through my resume/cv. Even with experience, finding a better job is no easy feat.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Trying to Figure it all out

It seems every time I write a personal blog post on here something bad occurs. Earlier this year when I was writing about a girl I was really into it turned out poorly. Then when I thought things were getting better with her, I wrote about it and shortly there after, she started a serious relationship with someone else. Maybe if I talk about something bad here, I'll have the reverse effect.

I absolutely hate my job. For the last 3+ years I have been at the same company, in fact, it is the only real paying job I've had since I moved to Vancouver. At first I thought this would be a fantastic career opportunity. I was starting a job at an improving apparel firm and I was confident expansion and growth within the company were my ticket to bigger and better things. I started working as the Office Floater assisting where-ever necessary. That meant some days I was working in HR, other days I was helping out the Sales department. Heck, I was even covering receptionist when she was away. It was the best job a new person could ask for; you get to interact with various departments and you learn about every aspect of a clothing company.

A few months later I was offered a permanent position in the Customer Service department. At first I didn't want it since I am not a Sales Person in that vein. I didn't want to have to call people up and demand they buy our stuff. Luckily, this wasn't the case. Instead, people would call me and I would simply place their order and/or check on the status of their orders. I viewed it as the potential of moving up in the company and took it. The first few months were nice, I was in charge of the most important region of the United States (The eastern Seaboard) and I got the opportunity to travel to Virginia Beach where I ran my first half-marathon.

But of course, I wanted more. After about six months in this role, a position that on-paper sounded interesting opened up in our Operations Department and I jumped at the chance to take it. It was our Production Planner position. I took it for a number of different reasons, it sounded like a cool position, according to the web, it was a higher paying position and I wanted to grow. Unfortunately, no one told me that it would be a position of waiting. Since so many of our off-shore vendors were Asian, with the 16 hour time difference, we never interacted in real-time. In the morning I would reply to all the messages I got from the evening then the rest of the day was done doing nothing. It was so boring since I was so used to working in real-time with people. If I sent an e-mail, I expected a response within hours not days.

HR could tell that I was not happy in my new role and offered me my old position back. It seemed that CS didn't find someone to take my old position and wanted me back. I took it and I've been stuck there ever since.

I was always promised the potential of moving forward. They could see that I got bored easily; I tend to do things quicker than most which leaves me with a lot of free time. Since they saw me spending more time doing things other than work, they tried to give me more responsibilities. Thus began what I thought would be my integration into Marketing.

I had quickly became the Marketing department's administrator. Whenever they needed something done, they came to me. On top assisting them when needed, I was also their main point of contact with anything PR related. Our outside PR agency would send their requests directly to me and they never needed to deal with anyone else in Marketing. It worked well; we got our products to magazines on time and I did my best to ensure the company's name was held in a positive light in the media. I had the opportunity to deal with O Magazine, The New York Times and even Wired just to name a few.

It looked like I would be permanently moved into Marketing, as an informal offer was made but then our company, which was recently purchased by a large Corporation, decided to do a wage/employee freeze and I was stuck in CS.

What hurt the most was that my salary was still very low in comparison to most employed people in Vancouver. I should have moved on to a better job but I honestly thought I had the chance to move up and everything would turn out in my favor. A year later and nothing changed. It continued to go against me when the Marketing Manager who made so many promises to me decided to leave the company. At that time, I didn't understand her leaving but now I do (I'll address that later on).

After she left, so did others in that department. I should have taken that as a sign but I didn't. The two people that left, who I both worked a lot with, were in positions that I thought I was qualified for (Events Coordinator and Public Relations Liaison). I applied for both position and of course, I didn't get them. What was worse was that the new Marketing Manager invited me into her office and told me that the new corporate outlook was to hire outside rather than to grow from within. I had so much experience but they wanted to bring in fresh people; essentially people that they could mold rather than someone who already was established. Funny thing is that both position still require me to assist them which really angers me.

I honestly don't see myself working at my current job for very much longer. While I haven't given my notice, I am passively looking for new work. The problem with that is finding a job is 1) a full-time job in itself and 2) my CS background limits me to where I can work.

For the last two years I have been a staff writer over at a small Video Game site based in Quebec. It's essentially a "work-for-free" position but I've enjoyed it thoroughly. At first I was doing it just because I enjoyed writing and I liked the idea of getting free games in the mail to review. But what initially started as a hobby is now something I want to be more active in. I want to be a more vocal person but because of my 9-to-5 job, I could only do so much. I couldn't quit my regular job since the writing was being done for free. What I was really hoping is that my writing gig there would push me to somewhere better, either with a large publication (eg. A National Paper/Site) or working for one of the many gaming companies in Vancouver (eg. Electronic Arts).

The problem there is that regardless of my hopes of writing for a larger site or working for a gaming company is that it is highly competitive. I have applied for so many different positions with various companies and never once heard back from anyone. I am more than qualified but it feels that either my requests are being automatically rejected or that is always someone better. I wish I knew people at these companies that could give me the edge I need as so many companies used automated services for their job positions. If I had a direct contact person, I could e-mail them asking if they got my resume rather than just assuming someone got it.

I have every intention on leaving my current regular job but not before finding something better. I still hold out hope that I'll get a job in the field that I want since I know I would make it work. I will do what I can and hopefully with how much crap I've gone through this year, something good will come from it.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

You & Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

Since catching the first trailers a few months back, I was comfortably on the Scott Pilgrim bandwagon. I hadn't read the Graphic Novel series but it contained a cool premise and interesting cast of characters that I was convinced it would be a great, if not at least a good, film. Upon talking with friends about the film, the clear consensus of my predominantly male circle was that none of them wanted to see the film, nor were they interested in the plot. To their defense, the trailers do not do that great of a job of appealing to the masses. Yes, you can tell the film is 'a boy likes girl' story but in my opinion, they don't do a great job on relaying the success of the Graphic Novel.

While none of my male friends showed any interest, I did manage to convince a few of my female friends to see the film and on Monday night, we managed to catch a screening. To my surprise, the theatre was filled on a Monday evening. The weather in Vancouver was fantastic, so my initial thoughts were that most people would spend the cool evening outside rather than indoors; this was a definite positive in my eyes for the film.

Another thing that I noticed in the cinema was the clear collective of "geeky" and "hipster" people in attendance. These are your skinny jeans, preppy dressed people who know their games but also feel like they are the authoritative person to talk to about anything "worth knowing". These people are clearly not the kind of people I current socialize with.

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is a fantastic film. It is well-paced, does a fantastic job with its source material and has a lot of laughs and references anyone who grew up in the late 80s, 90s and early 00s would catch. So why did it only garner 10 million on its opening weekend. Yes, it was against The Expendables, a paint-by-numbers Guy's film, and Eat Pray Love, a paint-by-numbers Gal's film, and both are able to bring in viewers because of that. But Scott Pilrim should have the vocal Geek squad that are the reason why Twitter and Facebook are so popular.

For Scott Pilgrim to succeed in the coming weeks, it absolutely needs Geeks and Hipsters to talk about the film to all their friends. Have these two cliques grown up to still be isolated people that only hang out with the same group of people? You get nowhere if a Geek tells his/her other Geek friend how fantastic Scott Pilgrim is since both are already aware of this. What needs to happen is that the Geek needs to tell his Jock Buddy how funny Scott Pilgrim is, how they reference Tony Hawk and Seinfeld; Geek needs to tell his Drama Queen friend that Scott Pilgrim has a lot of romance in it and that she should take her Boyfriend, the 9-to-5er to see it.

If people spread the word of the film, that is how Scott Pilgrim will succeed at the Box-Office. Kick-Ass required a lot of word-of-mouth to push itself to making money. Not a single one of my friends knew its source material but when I sat them down with the comic series, they were interested.

At this rate, it feels that Scott Pilgrim is destined to bomb at the Box-Office but to make its money in DVD/Blu-Ray sales. Considering the quick turnaround for films (roughly 3-4 months from Cinema to DVD), I would expect us to see Pilgrim on DVD in October/November.

Again, Scott Pilgrim was fantastic and it really needs your help. Tell your friends, take your friends; do what you can because there are often films that can't be missed and this is one of those.

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Will History Repeat Itself?

Ask most of my friends and they will tell you that I often look at statistics and patterns and the World Cup is often oozing with both. On the other hand, this World Cup in South Africa has seen more trends/patterns being broken rather than continuing. With three of the four remaining teams left in the World Cup playing in UEFA, the likelihood of a European Team finally winning the Trophy outside of Europe seems very likely. We can't forget that this is the first World Cup that the host team (South Africa) has failed to go beyond the group stage.

Another broken trend: this is the first World Cup that ends in a 0 (excluding 1950 which was only the fourth ever World Cup Final) where the final four teams were not previous Winners (1970 = Brazil, Italy, West Germany, Uruguay & 1990 = West Germany, Argentina, Italy, England). In the past, there has always been at least one team to finish in the top four that has never won the title before.

As you can see, there are a lot of patterns when looking at the World Cup and there are two more in particular that should be worth noting.

The first revolves around all four of the remaining teams. The last time a team lost a match in the group stage and went on to win the World Cup was 1978's Argentina; they lost a meaningless match against Italy (at that point both teams were already advancing to the next stage)before going on to lift the trophy. Since then, every team that has won the World Cup has along the way either won or drawn their matches. With that trend, the likely winner of this World Cup would have to be The Netherlands who are the only team without a blemish on their record. (We could also view the Dutch as playing at home considering the historical connection they have with South Africa)

But the other interesting statistic and the one that this Post is about, is the connection Germany and Serbia have in World Cup matches. For the following, we are looking at all iterations of both countries (eg. West Germany, FSR Yugoslavia, FS Yugoslavia and Serbia & Montenegro) as FIFA still connects West Germany's matches to Germany and Yugoslavia's matches to Serbia.

  • 1954 - Quarter-finals - Yugoslavia v West Germany 0:2 - Germany Wins World Cup
  • 1958 - Quarter-finals - West Germany v Yugoslavia 1:0 - Germany finishes 4th
  • 1962 - Quarter-finals - West Germany v Yugoslavia 0:1 - Yugoslavia finishes 4th
  • 1966 - Yugoslavia fails to reach World Cup - Germany Loses in Final to England
  • 1970 - Yugoslavia fails to reach World Cup - Germany finishes 3rd
  • 1974 - Second Round Group Stage - Yugoslavia v West Germany 0:2 - Germany Wins World Cup
  • 1978 - Yugoslavia fails to reach World Cup - Germany does not progress past the 2nd Round
  • 1982 - Both teams reach World Cup but do not meet - Germany loses in Final to Italy
  • 1986 - Yugoslavia fails to reach World Cup - Germany loses in Final to Argentina
  • 1990 - Group Stage - West Germany v Yugoslavia 4:1 - Germany Wins World Cup
  • 1994 - Yugoslavia is banned from the Tournament - Germany loses in Quarter-finals to Bulgaria
  • 1998 - Group Stage - Germany v Yugoslavia 2:2 - Germany loses in Quarter-finals to Croatia
  • 2002 - Yugoslavia fails to reach World Cup - Germany loses in Final to Brazil
  • 2006 - Both Teams (Yugoslavia is now Serbia & Montenegro) reach World Cup but do not meet - Germany finishes 3rd
  • 2010 - Group Stage - Germany v Serbia 0:1 - Germany TBD
At present, these two nations have met seven times with Germany winning four of those matches. Of those four victories, they have gone on to win the World Cup Three times, with the only blemish being in 1958 when the Germans lost to hosts Sweden in the Semis. Germany has only ever won the World Cup when they have defeated Yugoslavia en-route, as evidence with losses in the Finals in 1966, 1982, 1986 and 2002. In three of the four times Germany has reached the finals and lost, Yugoslavia failed to reach the World Cup.

Now with these two nations having met a few weeks ago, the Serbs recorded their first win against the Germans in a World Cup match in over 50 years; what does this mean for Germany and the quest for glory? If the trend is to continue, the Germans should either lose their upcoming Semi-final match against Spain or in the Finals to either The Netherlands or Uruguay. Or could we see this, like so many other trends, see both trends being broken? The answer to our question could be a few days away.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Emotional Connection to a Video Game

Fine, Video games may never be viewed in the same light as music or film in terms of art but they can still have a connection to us in more than one way. One of the most talked about games of the year so far has been Heavy Rain. Regardless of what people say, your experience in the game will most certainly be different than someone else's. Some love this while other feel that they would rather have a streamlined experience that doesn't stray off the beaten path.

Because I am also a contributor at a gaming site and was responsible for the site's review of Heavy Rain, I didn't want or could read other reviews of the game as to not dilute or affect my own thoughts on the game. Now after posting my review I have begun to think what connection people actually had with the game's subject matter.

As most people know, Heavy Rain is based around death and more specifically, the killing of children. This is a very touchy subject since death/killing and children in video game form is typically not dealt with. Just like Genocide and Rape, there are certain subjects that we may never get to experience in any sort of first-hand nature because of the controversy it would most certainly cause. Developers have purposely avoided such topics because they know that more harm and backlash would follow. Before Heavy Rain, it was Modern Warfare 2's 'No Russian' that broke the boundaries by putting us in the role of a 'terrorist'. Yes, we can argue for hours on if got the message across or if there was even a message in putting you in the role of a taking the lives of innocent people.

Now in Heavy Rain, you might not be directly killing children but it is the action of one man, a father, who ultimately decides the fate of his own child. Anyone who knows the basis of Heavy Rain, there is the possibility of either saving your son's life in the end or letting him die. This is not a spoiler but essentially the main plot of the game on the whole.

When reviewing Heavy Rain I had a number of different emotions go through my mind. For starters, I have a strong connection to death. I lost my father at a very young age, so I have lived most of my life without a father figure to support me. In this game, the role is reversed. It is a father who has already lost his first son and now is put into a position where he could also lose a second one. There is certainly a lot of pressure put onto a parent when they have already lost so much and could lose even more.

I wonder how many reviewers/critics of Heavy Rain have been put into a similar situation? I don't necessarily mean they've had someone kidnapped but have had to deal with a loss, specifically either they at a young age losing a parent, or losing a child. Better yet, how many of them are parents with children similar in age to the victims of the Origami Killer.

What started this thought process were comments made by Penny Arcade's Gabe who stated that after playing through portions of Heavy Rain, he was compelled to go to his son's bedroom and to give him a huge hug. The fact that a video game, of all things, made him so compelled to show off his emotions is something incredible. It may not seem like much at the moment and most certainly his child wouldn't understand the implications of why his father is randomly hugging him, but for a father, that moment means something that childless people probably would not understand.

Everyone is talking about the clearly evident plot holes and the limitations that Heavy Rain has but no one has bothered to bring up the emotion that Heavy Rain offers. I am really interested if that every crossed someone's mind while playing or have we become so separated that we are able to put a line between reality and entertainment. Love it or hate it, Heavy Rain does succeed in putting you in a position of controlling the life and death of more than one person.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Where to go next

It has been one heck of a week for me and thankfully it's slowly coming to a close. I have had to deal with a number of issue this week, one especially that I wish never came to fruition. I am still in a lot of 'pain' over the falling out between me and the girl. I have spent the last few days (Wednesday and Thursday) talking to numerous people, reading stuff online and trying to get at grasp of the situation and it still feels awkward and I am unsure what to do.

I have never been in this situation before. In the past, when I girl didn't like me I knew it and I never put too much investment into it. If I thought there was hope, there were still signs that protected me. In this situation, it just came out of nowhere and I never expected her to react the way that she did.

The question now for me is where do I go from here. When talking to my guy friends they are telling me to move on and to just forget about her. If she is meant to be, we'll still connect down the road.

I'd love nothing more than to avoid her for a few days but we work together. I have already walked past her desk twice this morning and while we didn't make any sort of contact, I know it will happen soon.

When I talked to females, they told me I should try to fight for her but within reason. The consensus there is that considering out history, it's impossible that she just all of sudden thought this way and that she more than likely has something else on her mind and doesn't want the drama of having a boyfriend (or a male friend) in the way. I completely agree with this view.

I want to talk to her but I am just worried that I'm trying to fix things too quickly. I know that if I act too pushy it will only cause more problems but I am also worried that if I don't approach her, this might confirm her fears that I was never actually serious about all of this. I want to make things right, so hopefully I will figure out what to do. Maybe just putting the effort will be enough. I know I can't just sit around and expect things to fall into place; I must put as much as I can to show her I want her and that she needs and wants me.